Policy consultation outcomes

In 2023, our housing team launched our internal process - "Eight steps to involving residents in policy, strategy and service decisions". This guide was designed to assist team members when writing important documents, ensuring they gave residents the opportunity to provide feedback at the early stages of policy and strategy writing.

Here you will find a summary of the results of recent surveys and any changes residents were able to influence:

Void Management Policy – April 2024

Impacted and consulted group

We invited all residents that had moved into an Arun District Council property in the six months prior to the survey, along with all residents that expressed a particular interest in taking part in policy consultation. We sent the invitation to approximately 90 residents.

Method

Residents were sent a survey comprising 8 questions, as well as a draft Void Management policy via email.

Response

We received 11 responses, which represents approximately a 12% response rate from the identified potential participants.

Key outcomes

  • 72% of respondents said the policy is easy to understand
  • 100% of respondents said it was clear what the policy is about. 
  • We received 5 free text responses, mostly commenting on our current performance

Suggestions made and our response

  • Residents requested we consider if any specific requirements should be added to consider the needs of sheltered housing residents, for example, retaining the installation of medical aids.
  • Residents suggested including a timetable of void stages.

Both suggestions were not adopted in the final policy. Any specific requirement for sheltered housing residents would need to be considered on a individual case basis and potentially supported by a medical report. Further, a timetable of void stages is an internal procedural document.

Damp and Mould policy – July 2024

Impacted and consulted group

We consulted all residents that had reported damp and mould to Arun District Council in the past 6 months, as well as all our involved residents and resident readers.

Method

Residents were sent a survey comprising 7 questions relating to a draft policy. 61 residents were sent a link to the survey via email as well as a copy of the draft policy. 

Response

16 residents responded, representing a 26% response rate.

Key outcomes

Over 80% of respondents said that the policy was easy to understand, with the remaining respondents being neutral. 100% of respondents said that it was clear what the policy was about.

Suggestions made and our response 

  • To consider further examples of major and minor works. 

Further examples were not included as the list was not exhaustive and the most common examples were already included within the policy.

  • To include information on clothes drying within properties

Information on damp and mould prevention is now available on our website: Damp, mould and condensation.

Pets Policy – July 2024

Impacted and consulted group

All residents could be affected both directly and indirectly by changes to this policy. This policy will not only effect pet owners, but also residents neighbouring pet owners.

Method

A survey was sent to all residents via both text and email. This was not a new policy, but a review of an existing policy, therefore we were able to also provide the existing document and seek views on this.

Response

We received 435 responses, which represents approximately a 12% response rate.

Key outcomes

  • A promising 75% of respondents said that the policy was either easy or extremely easy to understand, with a further 19% answering neutrally. 
  • 69% of our residents agree with the policy as it stands. 
  • 71% of residents believe we should not allow large pets in flats and a similar amount (69%) believe large pets should only be allowed if there is a private garden.
  • 58% of residents were unaware that a specialist cleaning company was required for pet waste.

Suggestions made and our response

We had a variety of suggestions and feedback from residents. Common themes included:

  • There should be a limit to the number of pets allowed.
  • Residents should demonstrate they are able to maintain their tenancy prior to being allowed a pet.
  • Dogs should not necessarily be permitted in first floor flats or higher.
  • Many believe pets should be automatically allowed due to the benefits for health and permission only revoked if they are unable to demonstrate responsible ownership.

We have amended our Pets Policy to state that permission for pet ownership will not be unreasonably withheld. We have outlined the conditions for when we will usually give permission and the number of pets we consider to be suitable. We also detail when we would withdraw permission for pet ownership. We are producing a Pet Ownership leaflet, that will be a useful guide and will answer frequently asked questions.

Access Policy – July 2024

Impacted and consulted group

All residents will be affected by either Arun's team or their contractors needing to access their home at some point throughout their tenancy.

Method

A survey was sent to all residents via both text and email. We had written a proposed draft policy, and residents were given a link to this.

Response

We received 220 responses, which represents approximately 6% of our residents.

Key outcomes: 

  • 76% of respondents said that the policy was either easy or extremely easy to understand, with a further 16% answering neutrally.
  • 89% of respondents agreed that the policy is clear
  • 88% of respondents agreed that the examples of time frames and when we'd need to access a property for welfare purposes were sufficient. 
  • Overall, the policy scored a 4.72/6. (A scale of 1-6 is used, so that respondents that are in the middle of the scale are encouraged to answer either more positively or more negatively, rather than choosing a neutral middle option.)
  • A score of 4.82 was attained for the statement "This policy provides reassurance to residents regarding when their landlord will need to access the resident's homes", with 54% of respondents giving it the top score of 6/6.

Suggestions made and our response

  • Some residents felt the policy was quite lengthy.
  • Some residents struggled to access the draft policy.
  • To address concerns about the policy's length and complexity, we will develop a concise crib sheet that will summarise the key points of the policy on a single page for easier understanding and transparency for residents. 
  • Additionally, we have launched a dedicated policy page on our website, ensuring residents can easily access all relevant policies. 
  • We have committed to reviewing our standard letters to ensure they are fully aligned with the access policy and effectively communicate the necessary information to residents.  

Mutual Exchange Policy – September 2024

Impacted and consulted group

All residents on introductory and secure tenancies. 

Method

The aforementioned group were invited to participate via both text and email.

Response

229 residents responded.

Key outcomes

  • Residents thought the policy was largely easy to understand, with only 8% of respondents answering that it was quite difficult or extremely difficult. 
  • 91% of residents agree with the policy and these figures are replicated across several of the questions.

Suggestions made and our response

  • We learned that we could improve the information provided about the specific property and contents, particularly gifted items. We have incorporated a more detailed explanation of what gifted items are and how items will be handed over as part of the mutual exchange.